seerr_create_overriderule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description repeats the annotation's readOnlyHint=false by saying 'WRITE' and 'modifies your Seerr instance,' but adds no new behavioral details beyond what annotations already convey. It does not disclose permissions, reversibility, or side effects, and there is no contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of a single sentence that front-loads the action. The 'WRITE:' prefix is slightly redundant but does not detract significantly from clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is minimal and does not explain what an override rule is, when to create one, or what the expected outcome is. Despite having an output schema and annotations, the lack of context about the tool's purpose in the broader Seerr settings makes it incomplete for a new agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the description need not explain parameter syntax. With 0 parameters, the baseline is 4, and the description adds no parameter-related information, which is acceptable given the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Create override rule' and adds 'WRITE: this modifies your Seerr instance,' which indicates a write operation. It distinguishes from sibling tools by using 'Create' versus 'Update' and 'Delete,' though it does not elaborate on what an override rule is.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_overriderule or delete_overriderule. The description merely states it creates a rule but lacks context on prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.