seerr_get_settings_radarr_profiles

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=true already indicates a safe read operation, and the description's 'Get' aligns with this. However, the description adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., what profiles are for, whether they are per-server). It does not contradict the annotation, so a baseline score is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that is front-loaded and free of fluff. It is appropriately concise for a simple getter, though it could be slightly more informative without becoming wordy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool has only one parameter and an output schema, the description is incomplete: it omits any explanation of radarr_id (e.g., how to find it) and when/why to use this tool. The annotation and output schema cover safety and return format, but the missing parameter context makes the description insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the required radarr_id parameter. The name hints it refers to a Radarr server ID, but no details are provided, forcing the agent to guess. This is a critical gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get available Radarr profiles' clearly states the operation (get) and the resource (Radarr profiles), distinguishing it from sibling tools like seerr_list_settings_radarr which list settings. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, such as needing a valid radarr_id, or that this could be used after listing Radarr servers. The description lacks any contextual cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.