seerr_get_studio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already indicates a safe read operation, and the description's 'Get' is consistent with that. No additional behavioral context (e.g., output format, pagination, rate limits) is provided, but for a simple lookup, the annotation covers the primary safety concern.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. Every word contributes to stating the tool's purpose, making it concise and appropriately sized for a simple get-by-ID operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and an output schema, but the description lacks any usage context or explanation of the parameter semantics. It is minimally adequate but leaves gaps regarding when to use it and what qualifies as 'studio details'. The output schema may cover the return structure, but the description alone does not fully orient the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain the studio_id parameter beyond its name. It does not state what the ID represents (e.g., TMDB ID) or how to obtain it. The schema provides only the type and requirement, leaving the description to compensate for the lack of detail; it fails to do so.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get) and resource (movie studio details), which is specific and unambiguous. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like seerr_get_discover_movies_studio, but the phrase 'studio details' conveys a direct lookup rather than discovery.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that it retrieves a single studio by ID, nor does it distinguish from discovery endpoints. A user must infer the usage context from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.