seerr_get_movie_similar

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation marks this as a read-only operation, but the description adds no extra behavioral context such as pagination behavior, language effects, or how similarity is computed. With annotations present, the description should still add value beyond them, but it does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (three words), which is concise in length, but it lacks any structural substance. It is under-specified rather than efficiently informative, earning a middle score for conciseness without completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With three parameters and an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not mention the required movie_id, optional page and language parameters, or provide any context about the return value. The output schema exists, but the description fails to orient the agent on how to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning none of the three parameters (movie_id, page, language) are explained in the schema. The description only says 'Get similar movies' and does not clarify what each parameter does, offering no compensation for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get similar movies', which clearly indicates retrieving similar movie recommendations. It is a specific verb+noun pair, though it does not explicitly mention that it operates per movie_id or distinguish itself from the similar sibling tool seerr_get_movie_recommendations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The sibling list includes seerr_get_movie_recommendations, which likely overlaps in functionality, but the description does not explain which to choose or what context each is appropriate for.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.