seerr_list_watchproviders_movies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond the annotation readOnlyHint=true. It does not disclose output format, pagination, rate limits, or any side effects. Since the description merely rephrases the tool name, no extra behavioral insight is provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but under-specified. It is a single sentence, but it sacrifices all useful information for brevity. The lack of detail makes it unhelpful, so this is under-specification, not effective conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one required parameter, no schema descriptions, and an output schema, the description is inadequate. It does not explain what 'watch provider movies' means, what the returned data looks like, or how to use the watch_region parameter. The agent cannot confidently invoke this tool based on the description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'watch_region' is completely undocumented in both the schema (0% coverage) and the description. The description does not hint at expected format (e.g., ISO country code) or its purpose. This is a significant gap for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get watch provider movies' essentially restates the tool name 'seerr_list_watchproviders_movies' by replacing 'list' with 'get'. It does not clarify what constitutes a 'watch provider movie', whether it returns a list of available movies, or how it differs from sibling tools like 'seerr_list_watchproviders_tv'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool. It does not mention any prerequisites, typical use cases, or alternatives such as 'seerr_list_watchproviders_tv' or 'seerr_list_watchproviders_regions'. The agent is left without context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.