seerr_delete_media_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description merely restates the destructiveHint annotation ('DESTRUCTIVE: this deletes data') without adding new behavioral details. It does not disclose irreversibility, scope of deletion, or required permissions, which are critical for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the action. There is no filler, though the extreme brevity sacrifices critical information, making the conciseness less beneficial than it could be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive nature and two parameters, the description is insufficiently complete. It fails to define what a media file is, what 'is4k' means, or the operation's scope, and does not leverage the available output schema to clarify expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema includes two parameters (media_id, is4k) with 0% schema coverage, and the description provides no explanation of their meaning, defaults, or interplay. The agent is left to guess what 'is4k' represents and how it affects deletion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete media file' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'seerr_delete_media' by targeting a file rather than a media entry, though the exact distinction is not elaborated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'seerr_delete_media'. There is no mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or typical use cases, leaving the agent without context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.