seerr_create_settings_notifications_discord

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that this is a write operation that modifies the Seerr instance, which adds context beyond the annotations. However, it doesn't detail what happens to existing settings, whether the body fully replaces or merges, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and front-loads the core action. The 'WRITE' prefix and phrase 'this modifies your Seerr instance' are mildly redundant but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with a free-form body and 0% schema description coverage, the description provides insufficient context. The agent cannot infer what settings are configurable or the impact of the operation, though the output schema may cover return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single 'body' parameter is entirely undocumented; the schema defaults to an empty object with additionalProperties allowed. The description gives no indication of expected fields, structure, or examples, so the agent has no basis for constructing a valid request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action (Update) and the target (Discord notification settings). It distinguishes from sibling tools like the list and test variants, though the tool name says 'create' while the description says 'update', creating slight ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus the list or test Discord settings tools. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.