seerr_list_discover_watchlist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint=true annotation already establishes the read-only nature, but the description adds no additional behavioral context. It does not explain pagination behavior, Plex-specific requirements, or any limitations beyond what the annotation already conveys.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, grammatically complete sentence packed with the essential action. It is efficient and front-loaded, though slightly terse, making it easy to parse but not overlong.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is relatively simple (one optional parameter, read-only, output schema exists), so a brief description could suffice. However, the description lacks any explanation of what the Plex watchlist is, how it relates to other watchlist tools, or how pagination works, leaving gaps for agents unfamiliar with the domain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate for parameter explanations, but it does not mention the 'page' parameter at all. Though the parameter is self-explanatory from its name, the description fails to clarify pagination semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb ('Get') and a specific resource ('Plex watchlist'), making the tool's purpose understandable. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like seerr_get_user_watchlist or seerr_create_watchlist, which may overlap in function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.