update_note
Modify note body and JSON fields by providing the note ID.
Instructions
Update a note.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| note_id | Yes | ||
| body | No | ||
| fields_json | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Modify note body and JSON fields by providing the note ID.
Update a note.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| note_id | Yes | ||
| body | No | ||
| fields_json | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'Update a note,' omitting side effects, whether it's a partial or full update, required permissions, or if previous content is overwritten.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is too brief. While concise, it lacks essential details, making it under-specified for effective tool usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite having an output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain parameter semantics, return value, or operational behavior, leaving significant gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the three parameters (note_id, body, fields_json). It does not explain their roles, defaults, or format expectations.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Update a note' which is a clear verb+resource, but it is too generic and does not differentiate from sibling tools like update_note_comment or pin_note, which also modify notes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_note_comment or other update tools. No context about prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RosenAdvertising/filevine-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server