Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to filevine-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Filevine matter management and Lead Docket intake APIs as natural-language-callable tools, enabling legal teams to query, update, and create projects and leads directly from Claude.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An open-source MCP server connecting Claude to Filevine practice management platform. Access cases, contacts, documents, notes, tasks, and custom PI data from Claude with automatic rate limiting and audit logging.
      15
      18 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server providing full Smokeball API coverage for law firm practice management, enabling natural language interactions with matters, contacts, tasks, billing, and more via Claude Desktop.
      100
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bill4Time providing API coverage for legal billing and time tracking, enabling natural language interaction with clients, projects, time entries, invoices, payments, and more from Claude Desktop.
      59
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects Clio Manage to Claude via OAuth, enabling law firm management tasks like matter lookup, time tracking, billing, calendar, and document retrieval through natural language.
      41
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that enables Claude Desktop to manage Clio legal practice matters, documents, billing, and more via ~46 tools, with secure OAuth and audit logging.
      46
      -

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 147 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes due to consistent naming patterns (e.g., get vs list, create vs update). However, the large number of tools increases potential confusion, especially between similar names like list_notes and list_project_notes, or get_user_appointments and get_user_tasks.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_project, get_contact, list_documents). Even less common verbs like archive, pin, snooze are still in this pattern. No mixing of styles (e.g., camelCase) is present.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 147 tools, the server is extremely large. While Filevine is a complex system, this many tools makes it hard for agents to select the right one and increases token usage. Most MCP servers are much smaller; this feels over-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of operations for projects, contacts, documents, billing, tasks, notes, and more. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of delete_contact, delete_note, or create_user, but core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive