Set parameters (batch)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds important behavioral information beyond annotations, namely that each update reports its own success and failures do not affect others. This is valuable for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short sentences, both essential. The first states the purpose, and the second adds critical behavioral context. No extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with nested parameters and no output schema, the description adequately covers the main purpose and key behavioral trait (non-transactional). It could be improved by hinting at the format of per-update results, but it is still complete enough for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of parameters, and the description does not add new semantic information beyond what is in the schema. The behavioral note is already in the schema's description of the 'updates' parameter. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates parameters on multiple nodes in a single batch request. The verb 'Update' and resource 'parameters on multiple nodes' are specific, and the batch aspect distinguishes it from similar single-node update tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use this tool (batch updates) and explains the non-transactional behavior (each update independent, no rollback). However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives like single-node updates.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.