Scaffold recipe template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructive and not read-only. The description adds 'Writes a file (destructive)' reinforcing this, and mentions the output passes RecipeSchema, but does not detail side effects beyond file writing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two succinct sentences with no wasted words. Action-oriented and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with no output schema, the description explains the workflow and purpose adequately. However, it could elaborate on the generated template structure and overwrite behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description should explain parameters. It mentions id, name, and out_file in context but does not describe their meaning or the overwrite parameter. This is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Write') and resource ('recipe JSON template'), clearly distinguishing this tool from siblings like 'scaffold_recipe_from_network' by emphasizing hand-authored bootstrapping.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: bootstrap a hand-authored recipe, fill in details, then apply_recipe. It implies a workflow but does not explicitly exclude alternatives or specify when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.