Skip to main content
Glama

Create autopilot

create_autopilot

Create a beat-driven autopilot that randomizes a target COMP's controls or cycles through its cues every N beats, enabling hands-free visual evolution during performance.

Instructions

Build a beat-driven auto-VJ: a Beat CHOP + a CHOP Execute DAT that, every N beats, either randomizes a target COMP's numeric controls (a hands-free drift, set by Amount) or cycles through its stored cues — so a set keeps evolving on its own. Creates a new baseCOMP under parent_path holding the Beat CHOP and the engine DAT; it modifies the target COMP at comp_path (its custom controls or stored cues) live at runtime. Live Active/Beats/Amount knobs let you pause or retune on stage. Reuses the tempo clock, randomize_controls and manage_cue mechanisms. Pair with a generated system (or a control panel) as the target. Returns a summary plus a JSON block with the container path, created node paths, the target, mode, beats, amount, engine path, any node errors, and warnings (no preview image — the output is a CHOP engine, not a TOP).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
comp_pathNoCOMP the autopilot drives — its numeric custom controls (randomize mode) or its stored cues (cue mode). Usually a generated system container or a control panel./project1
modeNo'randomize' nudges the COMP's numeric controls toward new random values each trigger (works on any COMP with controls). 'cue' cycles through the COMP's stored cues (needs cues from manage_cue).randomize
beatsNoFire an action every N beats (4 = once per bar at 4/4).
amountNo(randomize) How far to move toward random each trigger: 1 = full scramble, low = gentle drift.
parent_pathNoWhere to create the autopilot engine./project1
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that the tool modifies target COMP live at runtime and creates new nodes under parent_path. Notes return format with summary and JSON block, and states no preview image. No contradictions with annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single paragraph is well-structured and front-loaded with purpose. Could be slightly more structured with bullet points for readability, but it is concise and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, description fully explains return value (summary + JSON block) and covers all parameters. Addresses edge case ('no preview image') and mentions dependencies (tempo clock, randomize_controls, manage_cue).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions. The tool description adds minimal extra context (e.g., usage of comp_path with modes), but baseline of 3 is appropriate as schema already explains parameters well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Build a beat-driven auto-VJ' and clearly identifies resources (Beat CHOP, CHOP Execute DAT, target COMP). It distinguishes itself from siblings like create_cue_sequencer by focusing on beat-driven randomization and cue cycling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States to 'Pair with a generated system (or a control panel) as the target' and implies use for beat-driven auto-VJ. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or direct alternatives among siblings, but context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Pantani/tdmcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server