Skip to main content
Glama

Create MIDI controller map

create_midi_map

Build a MIDI controller preset for a supported device: create a MIDI input node and a bind table, optionally auto-bind faders/knobs to a target COMP's custom parameters.

Instructions

HARDWARE-GATED SCAFFOLD. Build a MIDI controller preset for a supported device (apc_mini / launchpad / midi_mix / nanokontrol / generic): creates a midiinCHOP + a labeled bind Table DAT, and optionally auto-binds faders/knobs to a target COMP's numeric custom parameters. Explicit bindings can override or supplement the preset. CC/note numbers are best-effort from published MIDI charts and MUST be validated with real hardware — actual assignments depend on device firmware. This tool is HELD FROM RELEASE until hardware validation is complete. For one-at-a-time MIDI learn of a single control, use learn_control instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
parent_pathNoCOMP to create the MIDI map inside./project1
nameNoName for the MIDI In CHOP node created under parent_path.midi_map
deviceNoController preset. Each preset embeds a best-effort CC/note map for that device (UNVERIFIED — real numbers depend on firmware; validate with hardware). 'generic' builds a bare MIDI In + a template bind table with no preset.nanokontrol
targetNoCOMP whose custom numeric params/cues the preset auto-binds faders/knobs onto. Faders bind to the first N float/int custom pars; pads look for matching cues. Auto-binding is best-effort and hardware-gated.
bindingsNoExplicit control→param/cue overrides. Applied after the preset auto-map. Omit to rely entirely on the device preset's default map.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations show readOnlyHint=false (write operation) and openWorldHint=true. Description adds details: it creates nodes, auto-binds best-effort, CC/note numbers unverified, requires real hardware validation. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Six sentences, dense with information, front-loaded with key constraints. Every sentence adds value. Slightly cryptic start ('HARDWARE-GATED SCAFFOLD') but immediately clarified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given parameters, annotations, and lack of output schema, the description fully covers creation flow, device details, validation needs, and alternatives. No output schema needed for this creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value beyond schema: for device, explains preset embedding; for target, explains auto-binding behavior; for bindings, explains override mechanism. This extra context justifies above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it builds a MIDI controller preset for supported devices, creating specific nodes and optionally auto-binding. It specifies the exact verb+resource and distinguishes from the sibling tool learn_control, providing a precise purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (building a preset) and when not (for single control MIDI learn, use learn_control). Also notes it is hardware-gated and held from release, setting clear expectations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Pantani/tdmcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server