Skip to main content
Glama
Txpple

fvtt-mcp-molten5e

by Txpple

create-quest-journal

Create multi-page quest journals from structured typed blocks. Define pages with headings, paragraphs, read-alouds, GM notes, and lists, controlling player visibility per page.

Instructions

Create a multi-page journal (quest log, handout, lore, GM notes) from STRUCTURED typed blocks — a STRUCTURING tool, it never writes the words. You pass pages of blocks (heading / lead / paragraph / readaloud / gmnote / list / grid / html); the tool renders them in the house style and sets per-page visibility (playerVisible -> players can observe a handout; omit -> GM-only). Compose the prose yourself (that's the journal-builder skill's job). For plain raw-HTML pages use create-journal instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pagesYesOrdered pages (e.g. a player Handout page + a GM Notes page), each a list of blocks.
titleYesJournal entry name.
folderNameNoOptional folder to organize the journal into (created if it does not exist).
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses key behaviors: it never writes the prose, renders in house style, sets per-page visibility. Without annotations, it provides good transparency, though could include details on error handling or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and front-loaded with key information, but slightly verbose in listing block types; still clear and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (multi-page journal with multiple block types), the description covers purpose, usage, block types, visibility, and alternative tool, making it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds value by summarizing the block types, explaining the structuring role, and clarifying visibility vs schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a multi-page journal from structured typed blocks, and distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'create-journal' which handles plain raw-HTML pages.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use this tool (for structured blocks) and when not to, providing the alternative 'create-journal' for plain raw-HTML pages.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Txpple/fvtt-mcp-molten5e'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server