timeiq_timer_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It implies mutation but does not explain side effects, required permissions, or behavior when the timer is not active. The phrase 'of an active timer' hints at a condition but is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it sacrifices essential detail for brevity. It is not well-structured or front-loaded with critical information; every sentence does not earn its place as it omits significant context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 0% schema coverage, no output schema, and a complex changeset parameter, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain the changeset structure, the dry_run flag, or the requesting_slack_id purpose. The tool's behavior and interface remain largely undefined for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the four parameters (id, changeset, dry_run, requesting_slack_id). The changeset object lacks constraints, and no parameter roles are explained. The agent is left with no guidance on how to populate these fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'active timer', specifying that it updates configuration or start time. It distinguishes from sibling tools like timeiq_timer_start and timeiq_timer_stop, but does not explicitly differentiate from timeiq_timer_update_entry.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are any prerequisites (e.g., timer must be active) or conditions for use mentioned. The description lacks context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.