timeiq_service_delete
Delete a service by its unique slug. Optionally use dry run to preview the deletion.
Instructions
Delete an existing service by its slug.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Delete a service by its unique slug. Optionally use dry run to preview the deletion.
Delete an existing service by its slug.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description lacks behavioral details. It does not indicate whether the deletion is permanent, cascading, or reversible. The agent cannot assess risk.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but omits relevant information about the dry_run parameter and behavioral context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of annotations, output schema, and parameter descriptions, the tool description is too minimal. It fails to specify return values, error states, or dry_run behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description mentions 'slug' as the identifier but does not explain the 'dry_run' parameter or its effect. Incomplete compensation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete'), the resource ('existing service'), and the identifier ('by its slug'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create, update, or list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use delete versus alternatives such as archive or deactivate. No context about prerequisites or consequences.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server