timeiq_service_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only discloses that it performs a partial update, but omits details on permissions, side effects, or response format. With zero annotations, the description should compensate more.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, no annotations, and 3 parameters (one nested object with unknown structure), the description fails to provide enough context for correct usage. Missing details on changeset properties, dry_run behavior, and return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning by identifying 'slug' as the identifier and 'changeset' as the partial update payload, but does not explain what fields changeset can contain or what 'dry_run' does. Schema has 0% description coverage, so both fall short.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (update), resource (service), identifier (by its slug), and the approach (partial changeset). It distinguishes itself from create, delete, and activate/archive siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it doesn't mention that for full replacement you might need a different tool or that activate/archive are separate operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.