timeiq_time_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'update with a partial changeset', which implies mutation but does not explain side effects, permissions needed, error behavior, or whether the changeset completely replaces or merges with existing data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise (one sentence) with no fluff. However, it could be slightly more structured with separate clauses for action and parameter hints, but it earns high marks for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations, no output schema, and 4 parameters including nested objects, the description is insufficient. It omits return value, error conditions, and behavior of optional parameters, leaving the agent under-informed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no parameter details. 'Partial changeset' is vague; the changeset object is unconstrained (additionalProperties: {}), and optional parameters like dry_run and requesting_slack_id are not mentioned.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (update), the resource (time entry), and the nature of the update (partial changeset). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like timeiq_time_create (create) and timeiq_time_delete (delete), and subtly differentiates from timeiq_time_update_many by implying singular update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like timeiq_time_update_many for bulk updates, or prerequisites such as requiring an existing time entry ID. The description lacks any contextual usage hints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.