timeiq_expense_category_activate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It states the mutation action and effect, but does not disclose reversibility, error states (e.g., slug not found), or required permissions. Basic transparency, but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, 13 words, directly states action and effect. No wasted words or unnecessary details. Excellent conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle tool, the description is mostly adequate, but it lacks explanation of the parameter and potential error cases. Could be more complete for an agent to use without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'slug' has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the description does not explain what a slug is or how to obtain it. It only indirectly implies it should be a slug of an archived category. Insufficient compensation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (activate), the resource (expense category), and the effect (sets isActive to true). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'archive' by specifying it is for previously archived categories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (for previously archived categories) but lacks explicit guidance on prerequisites (e.g., slug must exist, category must be archived) and alternatives. No mention of when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.