timeiq_billing_invoices
List all past subscription SaaS billing invoices. Access your billing history from TimeIQ.
Instructions
List all past TimeIQ subscription SaaS billing invoices.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all past subscription SaaS billing invoices. Access your billing history from TimeIQ.
List all past TimeIQ subscription SaaS billing invoices.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states a list operation without mentioning pagination, ordering, or any other behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose without unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, annotations, or output schema, the description lacks details about the output format, limits, or additional behavior. It is minimal for a list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters and coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed given the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists past subscription SaaS billing invoices, specifying the verb 'List' and the resource 'past TimeIQ subscription SaaS billing invoices'. This distinguishes it from siblings like timeiq_invoice_list which may cover all invoices.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as timeiq_invoice_list or timeiq_billing_info. It lacks context about appropriate use cases or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server