timeiq_service_category_delete
Remove a service category by its slug, with optional dry run to test before deletion.
Instructions
Delete an existing service category by its slug.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Remove a service category by its slug, with optional dry run to test before deletion.
Delete an existing service category by its slug.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
As a destructive operation with no annotations, the description should disclose irreversible effects, ownership requirements, or cascading impacts. It only states 'delete' without any behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the core action. It could be expanded slightly without losing conciseness, but there is no waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete tool, the description should cover the dry_run parameter, return values, and side effects. It lacks these details, making it incomplete for an agent to use confidently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description only clarifies the required 'slug' parameter implicitly. The optional 'dry_run' parameter is not explained, and with 0% schema coverage, the description fails to compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the verb 'delete', the resource 'service category', and the identifier 'by its slug'. This is specific and distinguishes the tool from sibling tools like create, list, and update.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other delete tools (e.g., timeiq_service_delete). There is no context about prerequisites, consequences, or whether alternatives exist.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server