timeiq_expense_list_me
List expense entries for a specified date range to review your spending.
Instructions
List expense entries for the acting user within a date range.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| start_date | No | ||
| end_date | No |
List expense entries for a specified date range to review your spending.
List expense entries for the acting user within a date range.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| start_date | No | ||
| end_date | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description alone must convey behavioral traits. It only says 'list', implying read-only, but does not mention pagination, ordering, limits, or safety. Lacks detail for a safe operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple list tool, but lacks details on pagination, ordering, or output structure. Could be more helpful given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. Description adds that parameters define a date range, but does not specify format, constraints (inclusive/exclusive), or behavior when omitted. Adds context but insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'list', resource 'expense entries', scope 'for the acting user', and condition 'within a date range'. Distinguishes from sibling timeiq_expense_list_person by user scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly indicates it's for the current user via name 'me', but no explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives like timeiq_expense_list_person or other list tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server