timeiq_notification_dismiss
Dismiss a single notification by its unique ID to acknowledge and clear the alert.
Instructions
Dismiss/acknowledge a single notification by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Dismiss a single notification by its unique ID to acknowledge and clear the alert.
Dismiss/acknowledge a single notification by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., side effects, permissions, or whether this is a destructive action). With no annotations, the description carries full burden but is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with verb and object, no wasted words. Efficient and clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description covers basic intent but lacks parameter descriptions and usage context, leaving the agent without full guidance.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the description adds no meaning to the parameters 'id' (number, required) and 'dry_run' (boolean). It does not explain their purpose or valid values.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'dismiss/acknowledge' and the resource 'single notification by ID', effectively distinguishing it from siblings like timeiq_notification_list which lists notifications.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like timeiq_notification_list or other notification tools. Usage is implied but not elaborated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server