timeiq_expense_category_archive
Archive an expense category to deactivate it, setting its active status to false.
Instructions
Archive an expense category (sets isActive to false).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes |
Archive an expense category to deactivate it, setting its active status to false.
Archive an expense category (sets isActive to false).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description carries full burden. It mentions setting isActive to false but omits details like reversibility, permission requirements, or impact on associated expenses. Lacks depth for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundant words, front-loaded with verb and resource. Efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, description lacks critical context: no explanation of return value, no prerequisites, no mention of irreversible consequences. Does not fully equip the agent to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% for the single parameter 'slug'. Description does not clarify what slug represents or how to obtain it, leaving the agent with no guidance beyond parameter name.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Archive an expense category' with the specific behavior 'sets isActive to false'. This differentiates it from sibling tools like activate, delete, or update.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Context signals show siblings like timeiq_expense_category_activate and timeiq_expense_category_delete, but description provides no comparison or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server