timeiq_invoice_delete
Delete an invoice using its unique ID. Optionally preview the deletion with a dry run before applying.
Instructions
Delete an existing invoice by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Delete an invoice using its unique ID. Optionally preview the deletion with a dry run before applying.
Delete an existing invoice by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| dry_run | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose side effects (e.g., irreversibility, cascading deletions, permissions required). A simple delete description is insufficient for safe usage.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at just one sentence, but it sacrifices informativeness. It could be expanded slightly to cover key details without losing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation with no output schema, the description lacks completeness. It does not mention what happens upon deletion, whether it is irreversible, or how to confirm success.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters. Notably, the 'dry_run' parameter is not mentioned, leaving its purpose unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'invoice by ID', which distinguishes it from other invoice-related tools like create, update, or list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention prerequisites (e.g., invoice existence) or conditions under which deletion is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tomi2k/timeiq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server