get_database_entry

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses that the tool returns nested structures like tables and event commands, which is useful. However, it doesn't mention read-only behavior, error conditions, or whether the ID must be valid, but the description does add value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, technically accurate, includes concrete examples of content returned. Efficient, though the parenthetical list is somewhat long.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and high complexity (many entry types with nested data), the description gives a good overview but lacks details on return format, error behavior, and edge cases. Adequate for a simple retrieval but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, meaning the description must compensate. It mentions 'by ID' and implies the kind is the entry type, but doesn't explain the enum values or the meaning of id beyond 'ID'. However, the description does indicate the tool is for a specific database entry, adding some context over the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a full database entry by ID, with specific details about what is included (tables and event command lists). It distinguishes itself from get_database which likely lists entries, but it doesn't explicitly contrast with sibling get_actor, get_skill, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit instruction on when to use this vs. the more specific get_actor/get_skill or search functions. The description implies it's for full entry retrieval, but doesn't state alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.