panelica_spam_delete_v1_spam_whitelist_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes the HTTP method DELETE, which implies a destructive action, and the endpoint path. However, without annotations, it does not disclose permissions, idempotency, or side effects. It provides basic behavioral cues but is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, consisting of a single line 'Remove from whitelist' plus HTTP and category information. It is front-loaded and wastes no words. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (1 parameter, no output schema), so the description is somewhat complete. However, it does not explain what the 'id' refers to or how to obtain it from other tools like panelica_spam_get_v1_spam_whitelist. The context from siblings helps but the description alone is minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers the single parameter 'id' with a description 'Path parameter: id'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 3, and no extra value is added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Remove from whitelist', which clearly indicates the action and resource. The tool name also includes 'spam_whitelist_id', reinforcing the purpose. It is specific enough to understand the core function, though it could be more explicit about what type of item (e.g., email address) is being removed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like panelica_spam_delete_v1_spam_blacklist_id or other spam management tools. The description does not mention any prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent without direction on choosing this tool over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.