panelica_domains_post_v1_domains_id_suspend

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a mutating operation, and the description adds 'Mutating: changes server state' plus the required scope. It does not disclose what suspension does to the domain, whether it is reversible, or what side effects occur, but it does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and well-structured, with each line providing metadata: HTTP method/path, category, scopes, and mutation status. The only weak point is the awkward 'Create suspend' phrasing, but there is no unnecessary filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is sufficient to identify the endpoint and required id parameter, but it omits important context for a mutating action, such as the meaning of suspension, any required or optional request body fields, and the relationship to unsuspending. These are meaningful gaps for an agent deciding whether and how to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents both parameters, with 'id' as a path parameter and 'body' as an open-ended JSON object. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 applies despite the body schema being unspecified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the endpoint via 'HTTP: POST /v1/domains/:id/suspend' and category 'Domains', so an agent can infer this suspends a domain. However, the actual prose, 'Create suspend', is vague and never states the behavior in clear natural language, such as 'Suspends the specified domain'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the sibling unsuspend endpoint or the suspend endpoints for accounts, FTP users, or SSH users. 'Required scopes' and 'Category' provide context but not usage criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.