panelica_domains_delete_v1_domains_id_databases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark destructiveHint=true, but the description adds valuable context by explicitly warning that the resource is permanently removed and by specifying the required 'domains:delete' scope. This goes beyond the annotations and is consistent with them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with the core action. The HTTP path, required scope, and destructive warning are all high-value; 'Category: Domains' is minor redundancy but does not meaningfully hurt clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter destructive delete operation with annotations, the description covers the endpoint, auth requirement, and permanence of the action. It lacks explicit alternative guidance and response details, but the simplicity and annotation coverage make it reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The HTTP path clarifies that 'id' refers to the domain ID, but the description adds no format, validation, or example details beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Delete') and target resource ('database from domain'), and the HTTP path clarifies the scope. However, it does not explicitly distinguish this from sibling tools like panelica_databases_delete_v1_databases_id or panelica_domains_post_v1_domains_id_databases, so full sibling differentiation is missing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the action phrase and resource path, and the description adds the required scope and destructive warning. It does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over alternatives or when not to use it, so the guidance remains implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.