panelica_domains_patch_v1_domains_id_webserver

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it 'regenerates all configs automatically', which is a key behavioral trait. No annotations provided, so description carries burden; lacks details on permissions, downtime, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences plus HTTP method and category. No filler, purpose is front-loaded, and every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is simple (1 param, no output schema) and description covers the main action and side effect. Could mention expected response, but not essential for function.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'id' described as 'Path parameter: id'. Description does not add extra semantics beyond what schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool changes web server mode between two specific modes (nginx_apache and nginx_only) and mentions config regeneration. It is distinct from sibling tools like patch_v1_domains_id_php or get_v1_domains_id_webserver.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to switch modes or prerequisites. Does not mention when not to use it or conflicts with other settings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.