panelica_domains_post_v1_domains_id_dkim_disable

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=false. The description's 'Mutating: changes server state' is largely redundant with readOnlyHint=false, and it adds only the required scopes. It does not disclose what disabling DKIM actually does, such as removing records or affecting email deliverability.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but the leading 'Create disable' is confusing and wastes the most prominent position. The 'Mutating' line also largely repeats what annotations already communicate, so the structure is terse but not effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a POST action with no output schema and an open-ended body parameter, the description does not explain what payload to send, what side effects to expect, or what a successful response looks like. An agent would need external API documentation to call this reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. However, the description adds nothing about parameters, and the body parameter is explicitly left as 'Schema not statically declared — see API docs,' leaving the agent without real field semantics for the request body.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with the garbled phrase 'Create disable' and never states in plain language that this tool disables DKIM for a domain. The HTTP path is the only functional clue, so the description mostly restates the tool name/title rather than clarifying its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as the closely related dkim_enable sibling. The description provides scopes and mutating status, but no context about prerequisites, when disabling is appropriate, or when another tool should be chosen.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.