panelica_domains_patch_v1_domains_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

While it mentions the tool updates configuration, it does not disclose any behavioral details beyond the description. No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden, but it fails to mention side effects, permissions, or what happens to existing settings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and to the point, but it omits critical information about body parameters, making it incomplete. It is concise but not fully effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and the discrepancy between description (listing many updateable aspects) and the input schema (only id), the description is insufficient. The agent would be unsure how to provide the configuration updates, making the tool poorly defined.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage but only includes an 'id' parameter. The description implies additional parameters (like server settings, SSL, PHP) but does not detail them, and the schema has additionalProperties: false, which contradicts typical REST update practices. The description adds no meaningful semantics for how to pass the actual update data.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it updates domain configuration and lists server settings, SSL, and PHP resource limits. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like panelica_domains_patch_v1_domains_id_php, leading to potential confusion about when to use this general patch vs. a specific one.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternative domain patch tools (e.g., PHP, modsecurity). No prerequisites or context are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.