panelica_domains_get_v1_domains_id_logs_access

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states it returns logs. It does not disclose permissions needed, rate limits, or that it is read-only. The HTTP method GET is implicit from the name but not explicitly stated as safe.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short, front-loaded sentences. No redundant information; every word adds value for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose but lacks details on what 'access logs' contain, the time range for 'recent', and output format. With no output schema, additional context would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter 'id' with a trivial description 'Path parameter: id'. The tool description adds no extra meaning. With 100% schema description coverage, baseline is 3, but the description does not clarify that 'id' is a domain identifier.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns recent access logs for a domain, which is specific and distinct from siblings like panelica_domains_get_v1_domains_id_logs_error (error logs) or panelica_domains_get_v1_domains_id (domain info).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like error logs or other domain endpoints. The description simply states what it does without context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.