panelica_cron_jobs_post_v1_cron_jobs_id_toggle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. 'Toggle' implies a state change, but there is no mention of effects (e.g., enabling/disabling, reversibility, auth requirements). The description is too minimal to inform the agent of side effects or necessary conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with two short sentences. The purpose is front-loaded. However, the conciseness sacrifices useful details, making it slightly under-informative. It earns a 4 for being succinct without filler, but borderline 3 for missing key context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a mutable action with no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context about what toggling does, the response format, and when it's appropriate. It fails to compensate for the lack of annotations and leaves the agent with significant ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (the single 'id' parameter has a description). However, the tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting, but the description adds no value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Toggle cron job', which is a specific verb-resource pair. It clearly indicates the action, but does not specify what toggling entails (e.g., enable/disable). This is somewhat implicit given the tool name and HTTP method, but could be more explicit for clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'run' or 'patch'. With sibling tools for cron jobs (get, delete, patch, run), the description lacks any context for selection, forcing the agent to guess based on name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.