panelica_ftp_delete_v1_ftp_accounts_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark destructiveHint and idempotentHint, but the description adds meaningful context by stating the required scope 'ftp:delete' and emphasizing that the resource is 'permanently removes the resource.' This goes beyond the bare annotations and helps an agent understand the irreversible nature of the call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with the core action, followed by method, category, scope, and a warning. The 'Category: FTP' line adds marginal value given the tool name and sibling context, but overall the structure is efficient and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter DELETE tool, the description, schema, and annotations together cover the essential invocation details: what it deletes, the HTTP route, required scope, and destructiveness. It could mention response behavior or error cases, but the operation is simple enough that this is not a major gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the single 'id' parameter is already described as 'Path parameter: id.' The description's HTTP path line reinforces that id is in the URL but adds no new semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Delete FTP account,' a specific verb and resource, and reinforces it with 'HTTP: DELETE /v1/ftp-accounts/:id' and 'permanently removes the resource.' This clearly separates it from the many FTP sibling tools that get, patch, suspend, or change passwords.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use is implied by the verb 'Delete' and the permanent-removal warning, which suggests it should not be used for temporary disabling. However, it never explicitly mentions alternatives like suspending an FTP account or states when not to use this tool versus other FTP operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.