panelica_ssh_users_patch_v1_ssh_users_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only says 'Update SSH user' with HTTP method. No disclosure of whether the update is destructive, requires permissions, or affects active sessions. Carries no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise (three lines), no wasted words, but at the expense of useful information. Could include brief examples or references to updatable fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is too sparse. It does not explain return values, prerequisites, or differentiate from other SSH user endpoints. Incomplete for an update operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage for the only parameter 'id', but the description adds nothing about it. More critically, the schema shows additionalProperties: false, implying no body fields, but a PATCH update typically expects updatable properties. The description does not clarify what can be updated, so the parameter semantics are incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States action ('Update') and resource ('SSH user'), but lacks specificity: does it update all properties or specific ones? Compared to siblings like 'suspend' or 'unsuspend', it is clear but minimal. No mention of what fields can be updated, reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., get, delete, suspend, unsuspend). No prerequisites, context, or conditions for updating an SSH user.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.