panelica_accounts_post_v1_accounts_id_suspend

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'disabling access' but doesn't explain what that entails (e.g., immediate effect, impact on active sessions, reversibility via unsuspend). No mention of idempotency or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences conveying the action and HTTP details. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks context on return value (no output schema), prerequisites, and relationship with sibling tools like unsuspend. An agent may not know how to verify success or what happens after suspension.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'id' is described only as 'Path parameter: id' in the schema. The description adds no additional context about what 'id' refers to (e.g., account ID). Schema coverage is 100% but the schema itself lacks semantic clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Suspends an account, disabling access', specifying the verb and resource. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling 'unsuspend' tool, though the name implies the opposite effect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. There is no mention of when to use this tool versus alternatives like deleting the account, or prerequisites (e.g., account must exist). The agent has no context on when to choose suspend over other actions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.