panelica_license_get_v1_license_plan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. Description only states HTTP method and category, but does not disclose behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, or side effects. For an unannotated tool, more detail is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Front-loaded with the verb and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description adequately explains the tool's purpose and return fields. No output schema exists, but the listed fields give sufficient context. Simplicity of the tool means less detail required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in input schema, so baseline is 4. Description adds value by indicating return fields (plan slug, name, status, expiry), providing context beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Returns' and resource 'detailed license plan information' with listed fields. Clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like 'license_status' and 'license_features'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other license-related tools. Does not mention contexts or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.