search_qcrecords

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It mentions filtering parameters and the 'latest' flag but does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication needs, rate limits, side effects, or what 'scope' means for 'latest'. The read-only nature is implied but not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with a clear opening sentence followed by a bulleted parameter list. It is front-loaded with purpose. Minor verbosity in the 'Args:' header, but overall efficient for a tool with multiple parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 6 parameters and no output schema, yet the description explains only input semantics. It omits return format, pagination behavior, and the meaning of 'scope' in the 'latest' parameter. For a search tool, additional context on output structure is expected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It provides brief explanations for all six parameters (e.g., 'Filter by project ID', 'Return only newest record per scope'), adding meaning beyond the schema types and defaults. Some ambiguity remains (e.g., 'scope' in 'latest'), but overall it adds significant value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Search QC records with filters,' specifying both verb and resource. The purpose is immediately understandable. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'search_qcrecords_advanced', which might have overlapping functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'search_qcrecords_advanced' or other search tools. No exclusions or use-case hints are provided, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.