list_workflow_aliases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a read-only listing action, which is assumed safe. However, no explicit statements about side effects, permissions, or the absence of mutation are provided. With no annotations, more detail would be helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences plus a clear list of arguments. Every word serves a purpose with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic action and parameters but lacks details on output format (e.g., list structure, pagination) or any special conditions. Adequate for a simple list tool but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Given 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaningful parameter explanations: 'The workflow UUID' for workflow_id and 'Optional filter to a specific alias name' for alias. This compensates well, though could elaborate on alias format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List aliases for a workflow', specifying the exact verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like set_workflow_alias and delete_workflow_alias.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_workflows or list_workflow_versions. The description does not mention prerequisites or contexts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.