create_file_record

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It notes the creation action and external reference nature, but lacks details on idempotency, duplicate handling, permissions, or side effects, which are critical for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the purpose and constraint, followed by a neatly organized parameter list. It is relatively concise given the number of parameters, though the list could be integrated into the schema's descriptions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should mention return values (e.g., the created file record object). It does not, and also lacks error handling or success indicators. This leaves the agent without a complete picture of what happens after invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It provides a one-line explanation for each of the 13 parameters, including example formats for complex ones like 'samples' and 'hashes'. However, some descriptions are overly brief (e.g., 'uri: File location').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new file record (external reference)', which uses a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes this tool from related siblings like 'update_file' and 'delete_file' by its creation nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description only mentions a constraint ('At least one entity association is required') but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'update_file' or 'get_file'. No explicit when/when-not advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.