nexo_state_watcher_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states 'update', implying mutation, but with no annotations provided, it fails to disclose important behaviors like whether the update is partial or full, permission requirements, or consequences. The burden is on the description, and it does not meet it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it is too brief to provide sufficient information. While not verbose, it does not earn its place due to lack of substantive content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 parameters, no schema descriptions, no output schema, no annotations), the description is wholly inadequate. It does not explain return values, parameter constraints, or behavioral details, leaving a significant information gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no detail about the 6 parameters (watcher_id, title, target, severity, status, config). The description should compensate but does not, leaving the agent with no semantic guidance beyond parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Update' and specifies the resource as 'persistent state watcher', distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, list, and run. However, it could be more specific about which attributes are modifiable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, such as create or list. It does not mention prerequisites like the watcher needing to exist or potential side effects.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.