nexo_skill_seed_from_outcome_pattern

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It mentions 'draft skill candidate' suggesting non-final creation, but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or error handling for invalid pattern_key.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose without unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one parameter and no output schema, the description provides a basic understanding but lacks details on return value, error conditions, and what 'materialize' entails practically.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema lists one required string parameter 'pattern_key' with no description. The description partially explains it via 'repeated successful outcome pattern,' adding some meaning beyond the schema, but not fully clarifying its format or source.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Materialize' and resource 'draft skill candidate from a repeated successful outcome pattern with linked evidence,' distinguishing it from similar skill tools like nexo_skill_create or nexo_skill_compose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for creating a draft skill from a pattern, but no explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives like nexo_skill_compose or nexo_skill_create.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.