nexo_agent_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It states 'Get', implying a read operation, but does not disclose whether it is read-only, requires permissions, or any side effects. This lack of detail leaves significant gaps in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (5 words, single sentence) but underspecified. It is front-loaded but could include more useful information without becoming verbose, such as the type of agent or what 'full profile' includes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of the tool (single required parameter, no output schema), the description provides the basic purpose but lacks details about the return value, field definitions, or any constraints. It is moderately complete but could be improved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not add meaning to the single parameter 'id' beyond the schema. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should explain the parameter, but it does not. The parameter is implied by context but not explicitly defined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get an agent's full profile' clearly states the action (get) and the resource (agent's full profile). It distinguishes from sibling tools like nexo_agent_create, nexo_agent_delete, nexo_agent_list, and nexo_agent_update by specifying retrieval of a single agent's profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that this tool is for retrieving a specific agent by ID, nor does it compare with nexo_agent_list for listing all agents.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.