Skip to main content
Glama
soil-dev

capsulemcp

list_party_entries

Read-only

Retrieve timeline entries (notes, emails, tasks) for a contact or organisation, including entries from linked people. Use to read conversation history and answer 'what's new with X?'

Instructions

List timeline entries (notes, captured emails, completed-task records) for a party. Returns entries newest-first. Each entry has a type ('note', 'email', 'task'), free-text content, and timestamps. Use this to read the conversation history with a contact or organisation — answers questions like 'what's the latest with X?' For opportunity or project timelines, use list_opportunity_entries or list_project_entries respectively. IMPORTANT for organisations: pass includeLinkedPersons: true to surface entries filed against the org's linked people (sales-conversation emails almost always land on a person row, not the org row — Capsule's API files each entry against exactly one party). Without this flag, an org with active customer-facing email will appear quiet here even though its lastContactedAt is current. For any 'what's new with $ORG?' query, set includeLinkedPersons: true.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo
embedNoComma-separated embeds. Valid tokens: attachments, participants.
partyIdNo
perPageNo
includeLinkedPersonsNoWhen true AND `partyId` is an ORGANISATION, also include entries filed against the organisation's linked people (the persons whose `organisation` field references this org). The connector enumerates linked persons via `GET /parties/{orgId}/people`, fans out `GET /parties/{personId}/entries` in parallel (concurrency-capped, default 5 / configurable via `CAPSULE_MCP_BATCH_CONCURRENCY`), and merges into a single feed sorted by `entryAt` descending, deduped by entry id. Default is `false` — single GET, existing behaviour unchanged. WHY THIS FLAG EXISTS: Capsule's API files each entry against exactly one party, opportunity, or project row (verified v1.6.6 wire-trace probe 4 — POST /entries rejects multi-party bodies with 422). For an organisation with multiple contacts, captured emails almost always land on a person row, not the org. As a result, `list_party_entries(orgId)` with `includeLinkedPersons: false` will miss recent customer-facing email — even though the org's own `lastContactedAt` is updated by the activity. This flag is the correct call for any 'what's new with $ORG?' question. WHEN `partyId` IS A PERSON: silently no-op — persons have no linked-people relationship in Capsule's data model, so the flag is functionally inert (the connector still issues a cheap `/people` check; the response is empty). LATENCY: 1 + N round trips for an org with N linked people, concurrency-capped (typical: 2-3 waves for N=10). Linked-person enumeration reads the first 100 linked people; use list_employees for explicit pagination when an organisation has more contacts than that. Use `includeLinkedPersons: false` for fast pre-screen reads where you only need the org-row entries (e.g. invoice/contract notes that are typically filed at the org level). PAGINATION CAVEAT: `page` and `perPage` apply to the MERGED window, and the merge has a hard ceiling — it reliably orders only the most-recent ~100 entries across the org + its people (each party is fetched at Capsule's per-party cap of 100, and a top-100-per-party merge is correct only up to global position 100). Windows that cross the ceiling are truncated to the entries still inside that top-100 set; windows starting beyond it return no entries and end the feed. It does NOT continue into older history. To read a specific contact's full timeline beyond the merged ceiling, call `list_party_entries` on that person's id directly (the default single-GET path paginates natively with no ceiling). For the LLM-driven 'what's the latest with $ORG' query this is the typical use of, the first page is exact and the ceiling is never reached.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. Description adds extensive behavioral details: merged pagination caveat, latency, no-op for persons, and why the flag exists, far exceeding what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is lengthy but every sentence adds value. It is front-loaded with purpose and then dives into details. Could be slightly more concise, but the information density justifies the length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description explains return structure (entries with type, content, timestamps, newest-first). It covers pagination edge cases, the important includeLinkedPersons flag, and latency considerations, making it fully complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 40% (only embed and includeLinkedPersons have descriptions). Description compensates with thorough explanation of includeLinkedPersons behavior, default, and pagination context for page/perPage, adding significant meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists timeline entries for a party, specifies entry types (note, email, task), and distinguishes from siblings list_opportunity_entries and list_project_entries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use this tool vs alternatives: for opportunity/project timelines use other tools. Provides specific guidance on using includeLinkedPersons=true for orgs to capture email entries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/soil-dev/capsulemcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server