ncloud_vodstation_create_category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only include destructiveHint=false, so the description carries some burden. It adds the dryRun preview behavior, which is a useful non-obvious trait. However, it does not disclose side effects like folder auto-creation (present only in the schema) or what happens on success. This is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the primary action. Every word earns its place, and the dryRun tip is valuable context. No waste or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 9-parameter create tool with no output schema, the description is minimal. It covers the core purpose and dryRun but lacks context on prerequisites, return behavior, or how encoding options relate. The schema fills in parameter details, but the description leaves the agent with gaps about the overall workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with detailed parameter descriptions (e.g., name mentions folder auto-creation). The description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond referencing dryRun, which is already documented in the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new VOD Station encoding category' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like ncloud_vodstation_list_categories and channel management tools. The addition of dryRun=false preview adds extra clarity about the tool's function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a helpful dryRun tip, indicating when to preview without creating. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it list exclusions or prerequisites beyond what the schema provides. The usage is largely implied by the tool's unique purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.