ncloud_ses_stop_import

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations declare idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is already disclosed. The description adds only the 'running' condition, with no additional details about effects, reversibility, or response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence that communicates the entire purpose with no filler. Front-loaded with the action verb.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple stop operation, the description, schema, and annotations together provide sufficient context. No output schema exists, so return values aren't specified, but the tool's low complexity makes this acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters clearly described ('Import task ID to stop' and 'Cluster instance number'). The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is 'Stop a running data import operation' – a specific verb ('Stop') with a clear resource ('data import operation') and a condition ('running'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like ncloud_ses_run_import (which starts) and ncloud_ses_get_import_history (which reads).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for active imports but does not explicitly state when to use vs alternatives or mention prerequisites like needing a running import. It also doesn't mention that stopping an already-stopped import may be allowed (idempotent hint).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.