ncloud_delete_bucket

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, but the description adds meaningful context: 'Permanently delete', the empty-bucket requirement, and the confirm=true safeguard. The warning emoji also reinforces the destructive nature. This goes beyond the structured annotation without contradicting it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tightly-packed sentence with no waste. It front-loads the destructive warning, states the action, and gives both the precondition and the required confirmation flag. Every element earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with two parameters, no output schema, and strong annotations, the description covers the essential aspects: purpose, precondition, and confirmation mechanism. It could mention error behavior if the bucket is not empty, but it's already sufficient for the agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: both confirm and bucketName are fully described in the input schema. The description adds a small reinforcing note about confirm=true, but most parameter meaning is already in the schema. This meets the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states exactly what the tool does: 'Permanently delete an Object Storage bucket.' The verb 'delete' and specific resource 'Object Storage bucket' clearly distinguish it from other deletion tools like ncloud_delete_object or ncloud_delete_multiple_objects. It also adds a crucial precondition (bucket must be empty).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear conditions for use: the bucket must be empty and confirm=true must be set. This effectively tells the agent when it's appropriate to invoke the tool and what's required. It doesn't explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use, but the context is clear given the tool name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.