ncloud_pca_update_crl_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate idempotency and non-destructiveness. The description adds the minimum 3-day constraint, but this is already present in the schema. No additional behavioral details are disclosed, such as whether updating the interval triggers immediate CRL generation or only affects future rotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no unnecessary words. It front-loads the action and then states the key constraint, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity and rich schema with annotations, the description is mostly sufficient. It clearly states what the tool does and the minimum value. However, it omits context about whether the change is applied immediately or via a scheduled rotation, and does not reference related sibling tools; a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% parameter coverage with descriptions for both caTag and expiry. The description repeats the minimum 3-day rule but does not add new meaning beyond the schema, such as clarifying what a 'CA tag value' is or how expiry relates to CA expiry.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Set' and the target 'CRL update interval for a Private CA', which is specific and distinguishes this tool from siblings like get_crl_config (view) and rotate_crl (immediate rotation). No ambiguity exists.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as ncloud_pca_get_crl_config or ncloud_pca_rotate_crl. The verb 'Set' implies an update but gives no prerequisites, exclusions, or context for choosing it over related operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.